My just-released novel, MICHAEL: Last-Days Lightning, which all too briefly, but nonetheless, thankfully, went to number one in Christian fiction on Amazon, has sparked the beginning of a follow-up novel. I’ve tentatively given the next novel the title MESSIAH: The Prince That Shall Come.
The story will build on the protagonist’s experiencing Bible prophecy fulfillment while in a state of having dreams and visions as the result of a serpent bite he received while he was on the Island of Patmos. MESSIAH will deal with Antichrist coming to power as the world’s greatest deceiver. This understanding is based upon Jesus’ words:
I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. (John 5:43)
Lord willing, the novel will be the third of the books that began with REVELATIONS: The Rapture Generation, in which Tyce Grayson received that snake bite.
The purpose of mentioning all of that—along with, of course, admittedly hoping to promote the novels—is that while researching for writing the third novel, I cogitated on some things about the Antichrist I’ve often wondered about over the years.
One of the primary things that has piqued my thinking—and imagination—is that there are two people in God’s Word who are given the title “son of perdition.”
British theologian Arthur W. Pink (1886–1952) more or less framed the idea that provided impetus for my thinking.
As we have seen, in John 17:12 Christ termed Judas “the Son of Perdition,” and 2 Thess.2:3 we find that the Antichrist is similarly designated—“That Man of Sin be revealed, the Son of Perdition.” These are the only two places in all the Bible where his name occurs, and the fact that Judas was termed by Christ not a “son of perdition,” but “the Son of Perdition,” and the fact that the Man of Sin is so named prove that they are one and the same person. What other conclusion can a simple and unprejudiced reader of the Bible come to? (from The Antichrist, by A. W. Pink, https://www.ccel.org/ccel/p/pink/antichrist/cache/antichrist.pdf)
Pink went on to write that he believed Antichrist, the son of perdition, will be a reincarnated individual. There isn’t sufficient space in this commentary to totally explain his thinking, but I recommend that you read at the link given above if you’re interested in why he believed this.
I can’t fully embrace this notion because of my bias against the belief in reincarnation by those held by Hindus in India and other places, and the fact that God’s Word says it is appointed unto man once to die, then comes the judgment.
That steels the notion against reincarnation in my mind, but leaves open the possibility for a return from the dead in the case of this one man—Judas Iscariot, who was apparently lost from the beginning, according to Jesus Himself in His prayer as recorded by John:
While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled. (John 17: 12)
I, nor anyone, can fully explain to my satisfaction why Judas went to “his own place” upon death, or why he was apparently instructed by Jesus to do what he was supposed to do at the Last Supper—i.e., go betray the Lord to the Judaizers and the Romans. We see these strange things in the following verses:
And after the sop Satan entered into him. Then said Jesus unto him, That thou doest, do quickly. (John 13: 27)
After Judas committed suicide, the disciples sought to replace him as the twelfth member of their group with one of two other men. They wanted the now resurrected and ascended Jesus to tell them what to do.
And they prayed, and said, Thou, Lord, which knowest the hearts of all men, shew whether of these two thou hast chosen, That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place. (Acts 1:24–25)
We come then back to Arthur Pink’s statement that both Judas Iscariot and the one who will be Antichrist are called not “a” son of perdition, but “the” son of perdition. These are the only two who are so-designated as this evil individual.
Pink goes on, in depth, to point out that Judas was called by Jesus “devil.”
Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it was that should betray him, being one of the twelve. (John 6: 70–71)
This, Pink believed, meant that Judas was so possessed by a supernatural evil spirit–by Satan himself—that he was lost without chance of redemption. This certainly seems to be the case, considering the total context of what we know about Judas Iscariot and about salvation as given in God’s Word.
The key word in the matter seems to me to be the word “men.” Was Judas a “man” at the time of his accepting the sop given by Jesus,? Or was he something other?
We look again at the Scripture verse about death and judgment:
And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment. (Hebrews 9: 27)
Yet Judas Iscariot died, by his own hand, and went to “his own place.” Still, he is “the son of perdition”—same as Antichrist’s designation. Not “a” son of perdition, but “the” son of perdition.
Further, Pink writes the following.
It is hardly necessary to say that in the Greek there are two different words for “Devil” and “demon.” There are many demons, but only one Devil. Further, in no other passage is the word “devil” applied to any one but to Satan himself. Judas then was the Devil incarnate, just as the Lord Jesus was God incarnate. Christ Himself said so, [as recorded in John 6:70–71] and we dare not doubt His word. (Ibid.)
Pink then refers to the following Scripture to round out his thinking on the matter of Judas Iscariot being one and the same as the future Antichrist—a reincarnation, of sorts.
The Beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the Bottomless Pit, and go into perdition. (Revelation 17:8)
He points out that most expositors of his time held that Revelation 17:11 referred to the final form of Rome as the last world empire over which Antichrist will rule. But his implication was that they denied that an actual being will come from the bottomless pit as that Antichrist character (verse 8). Pink maintains that it is Judas Iscariot in a reincarnation. But it is a supernatural man, indwelt by an evil spirit like no other.
In Matt.12:43 the Antichrist is called “The Unclean Spirit,” not merely an unclean spirit, but “the Unclean Spirit.”…
[In] the writer’s mind there is no doubt whatever that none other than the Beast is here in view. If this be the case, then we have further evidence that the coming One will be no mere man indwelt by Satan, but a fallen angel, an evil spirit, the incarnation of the Devil. (Ibid.)
I’m not at all sure about the term reincarnation in this case. There certainly is something profound connecting Judas Iscariot and the one who will be Antichrist, however. This “beast” will be wounded as unto death, then supposedly brought back to life at the midpoint of the Tribulation—another strange element to consider.
My own thinking revolves around the prophecy that foretells the first and second beasts of Revelation being thrown directly in the lake of fire. They apparently get no time of judgment before the Great White Throne as do men of the human sort. These are apparently already judged. This, to me, means they might not be or any longer have human, redeemable traits, so are summarily cast into that final place of the damned. Nephilim? I don’t know, but it’s interesting to contemplate.
Bottom line is that if you don’t know Jesus Christ for salvation of your soul, you will end up in the place where these two beings, the Antichrist and the False Prophet, will spend all of eternity.
Here’s how to avoid their fate as well as the fate of Satan, who will be the third being thrown into that place of eternal punishment.
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. (Romans 10:9–10)
WOW Terry, I read your Antichrist a reincarnation and was greatly impressed with it. So much so that I did my own search on how to calculate the number 666 for the antichrist to see if there is a possibility that ties Judas Iscariot. Well……….I found that Judas name supposedly does tie in and here is the entire article how. I cut and pasted that portion of the article that details how this guy arrived at his 666 conclusion, below.
I’m going write out the next verses so you can see how you arrive at the number of the beast and his name both at the same time it’s a very small math calculation but it is the way you calculate the number of the beast as you arrive at his name and his number all at the same time.Starting with John chapter 6 verse 66 you need one more 6 to calculate the number 666 or the number of the beast, so starting with verse 66 you count six verses forward to verse 71.As you arrive at verse 71 you have added the third 6 to verse 66 so you now have the calculated number 666 and the first thing you see is the name of the beast. John 6/66-71 Jesus answered them, “Did I not choose you, the twelve,and one of you is a devil?”(verse 71)(((6)))666 He spoke of Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon, http://nebula.wsimg.com/b3784356daed36f14de5031d1c873b51?AccessKeyId=227FA022244F2DE86A01&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
This is certainly something to consider. Lord Bless
Hi Terry !
I have a “ female “ question to ask. i.e., dumb. In Romans 10:9-10, we are told how to get saved, but there is not a single word about us “ repenting “. WHY ? Is it just taken that anyone who desires to be saved automatically will WANT to Repent ?
This bothers me, Terry.
Blessings, Carol Cole Atlanta
Sent from my iPad
We must, according to this Romans 8: 10-9-10 reference believe and confess.
When we “believe in our (spiritual) heart” it is implicit within that “belief” that we accept God’s Way –only Way—to Salvation. that way is Repentance as seen in Peter’s words in 2 Peter 3:9. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
I.e., it is repentance of this sort that keeps us from perishing in the sense of being separated from God forever.
I don’t think there is anything in the Bible which supports reincarnation, even for special cases like Judas or the Antichrist. What we do have are plenty of examples of people demonically possessed. Jesus cast out many of them.
Now Judas appeared to be possessed by Satan himself, as will the Antichrist be. It would not surprise me that Adolf Hitler was as well.
I think it might work something like this: I can get into my Buick and drive it or I can get into my truck and drive that. Each vehicle is totally dependent upon my actions. If some steals either one of them the respective vehicle will be dependent totally on what they do with it. If they want to use it for a bank heist getaway, that has nothing to do with me, right?
I think the same thing applies to someone totally possessed by the prince of demons. The person so afflicted might have opened the door initially, but once the full possession is in effect, their original identity has been destroyed, though the memories are probably intact for Satan to use as he will. Their body is just a shell, like a car, their soul (its original owner), displaced and likely already in Sheol in the place of torment awaiting final condemnation at the Great White Throne.
Terry, I have read your book recommendation “Can We Know?” by Charles K. Bassett, and I agree that it is compelling and worthy of considering.
I have just recently come across the belief on another prophecy website that Judas Iscariot is “resurrected” and becomes the Antichrist. My very first thought in reading about this was, as you have stated, “it is appointed unto man once to die, then comes the judgment.” My second thought was only God can resurrect the dead. And my third thought was as to Judas went to his own place was “absent from the body, present with the Lord,” and conversely, hell is the place where all who reject the Lord Jesus go (their chosen place.)
There is a conflict between Mr. Bassett’s work and that of A. W. Pink’s. They do not reach the same conclusion as to the identity of the AC. I admit that I am confused as to your thinking on the work of Charles Bassett and that of A. W. Pink.
I reach no conclusion as to any similarities or differences in the two men’s thoughts regarding Antichrist.
I simply tried to point out the eerie similarities between the one who will be Antichrist and Judas Iscariot. Also I come to the conclusion that it isn’t wrong for the Christian today to look at men today who might be a candidate for the one who will become Antichrist.
I conclude, in my opinion, that in the final analysis, no one will be able to identify that man of sin this side of the Rapture of the Church because the Bible says so. But I don’t believe that God’s word forbids us to examine leaders, etc., in regard to their potential for becoming the son of perdition.
Thank you, Terry, for your reply. My confusion was that this article came fairly quickly on the heels of your recommendation of Mr. Bassett’s book, and I thought you had perhaps changed your mind! Forgive this senior mind. I’m no longer confused.
Bless you, dear brother. Your ministry has been a blessing to me these many years.
Interesting thoughts to consider. Instead of reincarnation, perhaps a resuscitation would be a better word to use, even though it has been about 2,000 years since those days. There have been a number of resuscitation’s in the past. But there has only been one bodily resurrection from the dead so far – Christ’s. His bodily resurrection guarantees other resurrections: (1 Cor. 15:23, 24; Rev. 11:11). The Bible doesn’t teach reincarnation or the annihilation of the wicked dead as some cults teach.
Hi Kelsey. You are welcome to post here but we do not allow links to other blogs or websites. ~Webmaster
Hello love your articles, do you have any information on the High Priest Caiaphas during the time of Yeshu. Also, Simon the Canaanite. Thanks
No. Sorry that I haven’t any information in this regard, except to say that archaeological findings were reported on the historical existence of Caiaphas a number of years ago.
You can probably find something on this in a Google or other research venue.